New York Times FINALLY Admits Key Area Where Democrats Went Wrong In November…

The west entrance of the New York Times building at 620 Eighth Ave. April 28, 2016 in New York. / AFP / DON EMMERT (Photo credit should read DON EMMERT/AFP/Getty Images)

One of the most noticeable reasons is that they have chosen to focus on issues like free birth control, transgender bathrooms, and abortion on demand.  Those issues don’t resonate with your average voter in the flyover states.

Now, even the New York Times is admitting that Democrats have to stop being the abortion party if they want to be relevant again.

Here is an excerpt from a recent op-ed titled, “To Win Again, Democrats Must Stop Being the Abortion Party”.

From Weasel Zippers via New York Times:

When I came to this country from Ireland some 45 years ago, a cousin, here 15 years before, advised me that Catholics vote Democratic. Having grown up in the Irish Republic, I was well disposed to Republican Party principles like local autonomy and limited government. Yet a commitment to social justice, so central to my faith, seemed better represented by the Democratic Party. I followed my cousin’s good counsel.

But once-solid Catholic support for Democrats has steadily eroded. This was due at least in part to the shift by many American Catholic bishops from emphasizing social issues (peace, the economy) to engaging in the culture wars (abortion, gay marriage). Along the way, many Catholics came to view the Democrats as unconditionally supporting abortion.

Polls indicate that the nation holds mixed views about abortion. About 80 percent of Americans don’t want to criminalize it again. At the same time, at least 60 percent of Americans — and most likely a higher percentage of Catholics — oppose abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Yet despite the clear complexity of those attitudes, political discourse largely ignores the possibility of a middle ground between making all abortions legal or prohibiting them entirely. Mrs. Clinton, like most Democratic politicians, fell into this either/or trap last year.

Democrats should not threaten to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which forbids federal funds to be used for abortion except in extreme circumstances. They could also champion an aggressive program to promote adoption by strengthening the Adoption Assistance Act of 1980 and streamlining adoption procedures. The regulations in many states seem designed to discourage it.

Wise words.

— Advertisement —

Will the Democrats listen?


  1. Once the New York Times had a report on a LIszt performance.
    The reporter described it as a “jubilant pro life celebration.”
    The New York Times auto-editor changed it to “a jubilant anti-abortion celebration”

  2. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  3. Thank you for the well-written write-up. I greatly appreciated your generosity and help you offer through the no cost tips on your blog, especially the ones provided through this article. I know Betty would love to find out more of your blog post. We’ve sent your website link to her. We appreciate your thoughtfulness within this difficult time.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here