Hollywood actor James Franco is spending some of his free time interviewing guests on his new hit YouTube show Philosophy Time.
The show discusses a number of topics such as metaphors, imagination, beauty, and abortion.
Per the Daily Caller:
[Franco] doesn’t let Hollywood tell him what “movie stars” should and shouldn’t do, and he gets himself into all sorts of weird, esoteric stuff. He’s a dilettante, but at least he actually seems to care about the things he dabbles in. His latest venture is a YouTube series called Philosophy Time, where he sits around with academics and kinda-sorta debates various topics for a few minutes. In one recent episode, he jumped right in and stomped on that third rail: abortion.
In this episode, a philosophy professor at Princeton University, Elizabeth Harman, discusses the liberal defense of early abortion.
Franco has a very confused expression early in the video, then proceeds to rip Harman’s defense apart with one simple question:
[Harman says] “I defend the view that there is nothing morally bad about early abortion. So, a lot of people think, ‘Well, it’s permissible to have an abortion, but something bad happens when the fetus dies.’ And I think if a fetus hasn’t ever been conscious, it hasn’t ever had any experiences, and we aborted it at that stage, actually nothing morally bad happens… So, James, when you were an early fetus, and Eliot, when you were an early fetus, all of us I think we already did have moral status then. But we had moral status in virtue of our futures… But some early fetuses will die in early pregnancy due to abortion or miscarriage. And in my view that is a very different kind of entity. That’s something that doesn’t have a future as a person and it doesn’t have moral status.”
[Franco replies] “Can’t you only judge that in hindsight?”
I don’t mean to tell the professor her business, but when James Franco derails your argument in about 5 seconds…
— Advertisement —
Then rest of the conversation only gets worse for the professor.
Check it out: