CNN To Shell Out $70 Million In Labor Dispute

CNN has agreed to shell out $70 million, settling a 15-year labor dispute with more than 200 former employees.

According to the Washington Examiner, the former employees include “camera operators, broadcast engineers, and other technicians.”

The decade-and-a-half-old labor dispute was contested in the courts several times, including once when former President George W. Bush was still in office.

Here’s more via the report:

The group of employees sued the network after it replaced them with non-union workers. The plaintiffs accused the network of cutting them in order to avoid negotiating with their union and violating federal labor laws. CNN held that it was not legally required to work with the union because the workers were contractors through Team Video Services.

The settlement, which was agreed to by both parties, must still be approved by the National Labor Relations Board.

The initial case, when it was first filed in 2004, hinged entirely on whether CNN was legally considered a “joint employer” of the freelance workers that it hired, Law & Crime reports:

The lawsuit (started back in 2004) raised a number of important legal questions during the 82-day hearing. Among those issues was whether CNN should be deemed a “joint employer” for freelance staffers who’d worked for multiple companies– as is routinely done in the broadcast news industry.  Determinations of which companies are “joint employers” for labor purposes are initially made by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) – but can be inconsistent across presidential administrations when political differences control individual interpretations of administrative regulations.

And:

— Advertisement —

The case went before the NLRB during the Obama administration; at the time, the NLRB took a broad about what constituted “joint employers.” In 2017, a three-judge panel of D.C. Circuit Court (which included Judges Merrick GarlandBrett Kavanaugh, and Cornelia Pillardfound that the NLRB had erred in the criteria it used to make that determination.

Garland wrote:

Bottom line: In my view, the Board jumped the rails in its analysis of both the joint-employer and the successor-employer issues.

It is unclear when the NLRB will address the tentative agreement.

31 COMMENTS

  1. Good article in addition to simple to help understand explanation. How do When i try obtaining permission to help publish part on the article around my approaching e-newsletter? Giving correct credit ratings to your account this author in addition to link towards webpage would not become a dilemma.

  2. The subsequent time I learn a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I do know it was my choice to read, however I actually thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you possibly can repair if you happen to werent too busy looking for attention.

  3. Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe this website needs
    far more attention. I’ll probably be back
    again to read more, thanks for the advice!

  4. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our
    community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our whole community will
    be thankful to you.

  5. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles?

    I mean, what you say is important and all. Nevertheless think of if you added some great graphics
    or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!

    Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this site
    could undeniably be one of the most beneficial in its niche.
    Terrific blog!

  6. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit
    more than just your articles? I mean, what you
    say is valuable and all. However think about if you added some great visuals or video
    clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is
    excellent but with pics and clips, this blog could definitely be one of the greatest in its field.
    Wonderful blog!

  7. certainly like your website however you have to check the spelling
    on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I to find it very
    troublesome to tell the truth then again I will certainly come again again.

  8. Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard
    work due to no data backup. Do you have any solutions to prevent
    hackers?

  9. Good day! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of
    volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the
    same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here